Estate of Boyd
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.
Whether Beatrice Boyd is entitled to have her claim allowed will depend on the interpretation to be given to the following provision in the divorce judgment:
“6. . . . and the name of Beatrice M. Boyd, the plaintiff herein, shall be inserted as beneficiary in Policy No. C-0651-9765 with the Equitable Life Assurance Society for two thousand dollars ($2,000).”
The aforesaid provision in the divorce judgment was taken verbatim from a property stipulation which Beatrice Boyd and her then husband entered into during the divorce proceedings.
The learned trial court concluded that the claim of Beatrice…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Miner v. MinerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Bank of Cashton v. La Crosse County Scandinavian Town Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- R. B. General Trucking, Inc. v. Auto Parts & Service, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Bitker & Gerner Co. v. Green Investment Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
3Cited by15 opinions
- Prince v. BryantWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Richards v. RichardsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Wilharms v. WilharmsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Schmitz v. SchmitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Schmidt v. SchmidtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.