Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Moscow v. Board of Commissioners

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMccarthy, C. J.

Appellant bank made its tax statement for 1921 to the assessor of Latah county, showing paid-up capital stock of $50,000, surplus and undivided profits $27,262.45, expenses and taxes paid $756.27, or a total of $76,506.18 as the full cash value of the capital stock. It also showed a total of $96,306.49 invested in real estate, furniture and fixtures which had been assessed, and in Federal Reserve Bank stock. The result was that the bank reported that its capital stock had no valuation for taxing purposes. The assessor did not assess the stock. Respondent board of commissioners sitting as a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Templeton v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Ankeny v. BlakleyOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Burton Stock Car Co. v. TraegerIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Spring Valley Coal Co. v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1895

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Idaho Gold Dredging Co. v. BalderstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Mountain View Rural Telephone Co. v. Interstate Telephone Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1935
  3. McGoldrick Lumber Co. v. Benewah CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Utah Oil Refining Co. v. HendrixIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Winton Lumber Co. v. Kootenai CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API