Legal Opinion

Mountain View Rural Telephone Co. v. Interstate Telephone Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1935No. 6208PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, C. J.

Prior to 1926, appellant’s predecessor in interest had entered into contracts with various rural, privately owned, co-operative, telephone lines of which respondent was and is one, there being some twenty others, for exchange service rendered by appellant at the rate of 50 cents per phone per month for some lines, others at 75 cents, and others having no contracts at all at various similar amounts.

In 1926, appellant’s predecessor in interest gave notice of cancelation of this rate and inauguration of the rate of 75 cents, which since that time has been paid by the users of respondents’ lines.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. McCueSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Brooks-Scanlon Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of La.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. United Rs. & Elec. Co. of Baltimore v. WestSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Boise Water Corp. v. Idaho Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Idaho Gold Dredging Co. v. BalderstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Newland v. ChildIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Christensen v. WestIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Application of Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1951

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API