Legal Opinion

Lichnovsky v. Ziebart International Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 15, 1979No. Docket 78-2796PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDanhof, C.J.

In 1963 the plaintiff was approached by representatives of Auto Body Rustproofing, Inc., who offered him a franchise to sell and apply the then recently developed "Ziebart process” for rustproofing automobiles. Negotiations between the parties produced a "license agreement”, composed by the defendant and signed by the parties on June 13, 1963.1

The agreement granted the plaintiff the exclusive right to operate an "Auto Body Rustproofing” station in Genesee County, including the right to use "Ziebart Compounds” and the tools and processes developed by the defendant for their application. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Paisley v. LucasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  2. Beebe v. the Columbia Axle Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. General Tire and Rubber Co. v. Distributors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Adkisson v. OzmentAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. Ladd v. TeichmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cloverdale Equipment Company v. Simon Aerials, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  2. Lichnovsky v. Ziebart International Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Lichnovsky v. Ziebart International Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Lichnovsky v. Ziebart International Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API