Legal Opinion

Lichnovsky v. Ziebart International Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 25, 1983No. Docket No. 67700PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This case is here on remand from the Supreme Court. It involves a claim by defendants that plaintiff breached a licensing agreement entered into in 1963. The circuit court ruled that plaintiff was not in breach of the agreement *607and that plaintiff had a legal right to use the trade name Ziebart in the operation of his business. The court issued an order restraining defendant from terminating the agreement and from "harassing or obstructing or interfering in any way with the conduct of the [plaintiffs] business”.

In its prior opinion, this Court ruled that plaintiff was required to comply with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lichnovsky v. Ziebart International Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Lichnovsky v. Ziebart International Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Ambo v. HolcombMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jerome Trenkamp v. Estate of Melvin KeyserMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API