Legal Opinion

Hellbusch v. Rheinholdt

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1976PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBryson, J.

Plaintiff brought this suit to foreclose a mechanic’s lien on defendants’ dwelling for the balance due on the construction contract. Defendants appeal from a decree in favor of plaintiff. We review de novo.

In November, 1972, defendants contacted plaintiff regarding the construction of a home for them in Bend, Oregon. They had no plans or specifications. By March of 1973 defendants had a designer prepare the plans and elevation drawings but no specifications. In the latter part of May, 1973, defendants asked plaintiff "to get started on the foundation on a cost plus basis.” Defendants did not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Green Mountain Log Co. v. Columbia & Nehalem River RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Andrews Equipment Service v. R. A. Heintz Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Parsons v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  2. VTech Communications, Inc. v. Robert Half, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. In Re PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Brown v. D2S Resources, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. Roelle v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API