State v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was indicted by the grand jury of Le Sueur county of the crime of carnally knowing and abusing a female child under the age of eighteen years. He pleaded not guilty, and was tried before Morrison, J., and a jury which found defendant guilty as charged in the indictment. From the order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Defendant was convicted of carnally knowing and abusing a female child of the age of thirteen years, and appealed from an order denying a new trial.
1. Defendant contends that the evidence is insufficient to justify the conviction. In this we do not concur. The prosecutrix testified that on June 4, 1909, the time charged in the indictment, defendant had carnal knowledge of her person with her consent. She detailed the facts and circumstances, the time and place, with clearness, and, though uncorroborated as to the commission of the act by defendant, her testimony, if believed by the jury, was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. ConnellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- State v. QuirkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- State v. BlackburnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- State v. FournierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- State v. NewmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. McPaddenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- State v. RutledgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- State v. ShansySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- State v. TrockeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Kayes v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.