State v. McPadden
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was indicted by the grand jury of Carver county charged with the crime of carnal knowledge of a female child under 18 years of age, tried in the district court for that county before Tifft, J., and a jury and found guilty as charged in the indictment. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.
Defendant was convicted of statutory rape upon a female under the age of 18 years and appealed from an order denying a new trial.
The questions raised by the assignments of error do not call for extended consideration. The record presents nothing not found in the ordinary case of this character, and a brief reference to the points raised in support of .the appeal will suffice.
1. The evidence of the commission of the crime by defendant as given by complainant, though directly and flatly denied by him, presented an issue of fact for the jury. We discover from the record no fact or circumstance…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- People v. GrayIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
- People v. AbbottMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- State v. SchuellerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- State v. HammockIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
- State v. SibleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1936
- State v. ElijahSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Self v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
- State v. RichardsonMontana Supreme Court · 1922
- Schreiner v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.