State v. Quirk
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was convicted in the district court for Hennepin county of manslaughter in the first degree. From an order of Frederick V~ Brown, J., denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The appellant was indicted by the grand jury of Hennepin county for murder in the first degree, and was convicted of manslaughter im the first degree. The appeal is from an order denying his motion fora new trial.
The assignments of error question the legality of certain proceedings-in connection with the impaneling of the jury, the exclusion of a certain, person from the courtroom, certain instructions given to the jury, and the extent to which the county attorney was permitted to cross-examine-the defendant with reference to his former occupations and modes of" life.
1. The proceedings by…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. DurrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- State v. MortensenUtah Supreme Court · 1903
- Lambright v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
- State v. WeemsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- Gardner v. KelloggSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. NorgaardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- State v. GulbrandsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- State v. GressSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- State v. GordonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.