State v. Rutledge
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was indicted by the grand jury of St. Lonis county, charged with the crime of carnal knowledge of a child under 18 years of age, tried in the district court for that county before Hughes, J., and found guilty of the crime charged in the indictment. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
The defendant was convicted of the crime of having carnal knowledge of a female child under the age of 18 years. He appeals from ah order denying his motion for a new trial.
1. The defendant was a teacher in the Chisholm high school and the girl was his pupil. He was asked on cross-examination whether he had not taken improper familiarities, bordering in some cases on indecent liberties, with four other girls who were his pupils. Objections were overruled and he answered in the negative. Afterwards, when the jury was absent, the court sustained objections to offers to prove the facts suggested…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. SailorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- State v. ShtemmeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- State v. RobySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- State v. HaneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Shaw v. UtechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- State v. HuffstutlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- State v. DePauwSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.