Legal Opinion

In re Testosterone Replacement Therapy Products Liability Litigation Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 30, 2015No. 14 C 1748; MDL No. 2545PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*970 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge:

In this multidistrict litigation proceeding (MDL), over two thousand individual lawsuits, filed throughout the country, have been consolidated for coordinated pretrial proceedings in this Court. Plaintiffs in the individual cases have jointly filed a master complaint, which sets forth common allegations regarding plaintiffs’ claims against the multiple defendants in the MDL. All of the plaintiffs allege that they suffered injuries caused by defendants’ testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) drugs. Two of the defendants, Besins…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Guaranteed Rate, Inc. v. ConnDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
  2. Mohammed v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
  3. Liggins v. Abbvie Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  4. Hill v. Consultants in Pathology, S.C.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. Kapoor v. Nat'l Rifle Ass'n of Am.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API