Legal Opinion

Gill v. Johnson

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 16, 1930No. Docket No. 269PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, J.

This is an action brought under the provisions of the so-called Torrens Land Title Act (Stats. 1915, p. 1932; Deering’s Gen. Laws, 1923, Act. 8589, pp. 3611 to 3644). For the sake of brevity, this law will be hereinafter referred to as the Torrens Law. Subdivision 2 of section 105 of this act reads in part as follows:

“Any person who, without fraud or negligence on his part, is deprived of any interest or estate in land through the operation of any provision of this act or by reason of the fraud, forgery, negligence, omission, mistake or misfeasance of any person, and who is precluded from…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. County of San Luis Obispo v. GageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Riley v. ForbesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. McFarland v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. People Ex Rel. Board of State Harbor Commissioners v. Pacific Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Trezevant v. W. R. Strong Co.California Supreme Court · 1894

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fresno City High School District v. De CaristoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. Campbell Building Co. v. State Road CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Smith v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. McPheeters v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Chase v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API