Maki v. St. Luke's Hospital Ass'n
Supreme Court of Minnesota
After the decision upon the former appeal reported in 122 Minn. 444, 142 N. W. 705, judgment was entered as directed by this court. Erom the judgment, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.
This action was brought to recover for personal injuries. Plaintiff had a verdict, and defendant moved the court for judgment notwithstanding the verdict which was denied. Thereafter plaintiff •moved for a new trial on the ground that the damages awarded by the jury were inadequate. The motion was granted and defendant .appealed. It was held on that appeal that plaintiff was not entitled to recover; that the defense interposed by defendant that plaintiff’s cause of action, prior to the commencement of the action, had been compromised and settled, and a release and satisfaction thereof…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cruikshank v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Maki v. St. Luke's Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- International Boom Co. v. Rainy Lake River Boom Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Webber v. AxtellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- O'Connor v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913