Legal Opinion

Behr v. Schmidt

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 1, 1939No. 32,180PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Justice.

Appeal from an order of the district court of Freeborn county denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, following a verdict for $230.60, directed in plaintiff’s favor for property damage in an automobile collision. The question presented is whether the court was justified in directing a verdict for the plaintiff.

At about noon of September 24, 1938, plaintiff was driving his Chevrolet sedan southerly on a township road in Pickerel township in Freeborn county. Defendant, whose farm buildings were west of this road, was driving his Ford car from a field east of that road across…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Abbett v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  2. Webber v. AxtellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Merritt v. StuveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  2. Warning v. KANABEC COUNTY CO-OPERATIVE OIL ASSN.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Packar v. BrooksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  4. Salters v. UhlirSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  5. Boerner v. WiemannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API