Legal Opinion

Giaccio v. City of New York

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 15, 2007No. 04 Civ. 3652(RWS)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendants, the City of New York (the “City”), the New York City Department of Transportation (“DOT”) and Iris Weinshall (‘Weinshall”) (collectively, the “Defendants”) have moved for summary judgment under Rule 56, Fed, R. Civ. P. to dismiss the Amended Complaint of plaintiff, Peter Giaccio, Jr. (“Giaccio” or the “Plaintiff’). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted.

Prior Proceedings

Giaccio filed his complaint on May 13, 2004 alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12112(d); 42 U.S.C. § 1983; the New York…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Koch v. SchapiroDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  2. Katz v. Adecco USA, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  3. Porfiri v. Moure-ErasoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  4. M.O.C.H.A. Society, Inc. v. City of BuffaloDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2012
  5. Jones v. LaceyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API