Legal Opinion

Koch v. Schapiro

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 30, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2010-0150PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) and Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or, in the alternative, for summary judgment under Rule 56. Plaintiff, Randolph S. Koch, has charged his employer, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), with violating various employment discrimination statutes. The defendant asserts that Mr. Koch’s claims must be dismissed for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. After careful consideration of the parties’ papers, the relevant legal…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Mount v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  2. Latson v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  3. Ramsey v. MonizDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  4. Koch v. SchapiroDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  5. Golden v. Management & Training CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API