Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Adams
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 20, 2014No. Civil Action Nos. 10-5026 (DRD), 10-2113(DRD)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
APPLIES TO BOTH ACTIONS
DEBEVOISE, Senior District Judge:
Moving to dismiss Plaintiffs claims, pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Defendants essentially maintain that Plaintiffs failed to state a plausible claim against them simply because Defendants are high-ranking supervising officials, and Plaintiffs’ facts lack the particularities of Defendants’ -decision-making process and actions. This Court disagrees and will deny Defendants’ motions, in part, and grant them in part.
I. BACKGROUND
Both Plaintiffs are civilly committed sexually violent predators (“SVPs”)…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Burgos v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- GLAZEWSKI v. BARNETTDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- PINES v. DAVISDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- SARBOUKH v. MURPHYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- SMITH v. HICKSDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.