Legal Opinion
Burgos v. City of Philadelphia
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 6, 2017No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-4894PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Rufe, District Judge
In his Second Amended Complaint, pro sePlaintiff David Burgos alleges that Defendants violated his constitutional rights by holding him in a filthy and overcrowded cell at Curran-Fromhold Correctional Facility (“CFCF”).1 Most Defendants have moved to dismiss, and Plaintiff now seeks leave to file a Third Amended Complaint. For the reasons that follow, Plaintiff will be granted leave to file the Third Amended Complaint, and Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint will be dismissed as moot.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs allegations stem from his…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hall-Wadley v. Maint. Dep'tDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Atkins v. Borough of Phoenixville, Michael Bauerly, David Boelker, E. Jean Krack Michael Speck, Phoenixville Police Dep't, William Mossman, Peco Energy Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- BELDING v. RUSSODistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- BELDING v. RUSSODistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- BENSON v. AMERIHOME MORTGAGE COMPANY, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.