Legal Opinion

Lincoln Mortgage Investors v. Cook

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 21, 1983No. 57017PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLIN, Justice:

This case presents an issue of first impression in Oklahoma: the validity of due-on-sale clauses in mortgages when the lender is not a federal lending institution.1 Specifically at issue is whether the due-on-sale clause is invalid per se as a clog on the equity of redemption; if not, whether the due-on-sale clause is unenforceable as an unreasonable restraint on alienation absent a showing by the lender that his security has been impaired and/or that foreclosure is fair, reasonable and equitable under the circumstances. We must respond to both in the negative.

Lincoln Mortgage…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Wellenkamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Malouff v. Midland Federal Savings and Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  4. Tucker v. Pulaski Federal Savings & Loan AssociationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  5. Gunther v. WhiteTennessee Supreme Court · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Willis v. Nowata Land and Cattle Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. In Re Wayne D. And Annie M. Thompson, Debtors-Appellees. Jim Walter Homes, Inc., Creditor-Appellant v. Ann Spears, Trustee-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  3. McGINNITY v. KIRKSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
  4. Stenger v. Great Southern Savings & Loan Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Sooner Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Oklahoma Central Credit UnionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API