Legal Opinion

United States v. Rohm and Haas Co.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided September 27, 1996No. Civil Action 85-4386PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RODRIGUEZ, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on several motions: (1) plaintiff United States of America’s (“USA-EPA”) motion for partial summary judgment on liability based on the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq.; (2) plaintiffintervenor New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection’s (“NJDEP”) similar motion based on the New Jersey Spill Compensation and Control Act (Spill Act), N.J.SA. § 58:10-23.11 et seq.; and (3) defendant Owens-Illinois, Inc.’s (“Owens-Illinois”) cross-motion for summary…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. State, Dept. of Environ. Protect. v. Ventron Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  5. Amoco Oil Company v. Borden, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. California Department of Toxic Substances Control v. Alco Pacific, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2002
  2. United States v. Sensient Colors, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
  3. New Jersey Turnpike Authority v. PPG Industries, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
  4. United States v. ManzoDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
  5. Carrier Corp. v. PiperDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API