Legal Opinion

Warriner v. Stanton

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 18, 2007No. 05-3435PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FISHER, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court for the District of New Jersey granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a diversity action. The sole issue presented on appeal is whether the District Court erred in its choice of law analysis. Applying New Jersey’s “governmental interest” test, which requires a court to consider the nature and magnitude of each state’s interest in having its law govern a particular issue, the District Court concluded Delaware had a stronger interest than New Jersey in seeing its tort statute of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Heavner v. Uniroyal, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  4. Veazey v. DoremusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  5. Mellk v. SarahsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Arcand v. Brother International Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
  2. Thabault v. Chait Ex Rel. Estate of ChaitCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  3. Dzielak v. Whirlpool Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
  4. Harper v. LG ELECTRONICS USA, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
  5. Williams v. WynderCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API