Legal Opinion

Williams v. Wynder

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 15, 2007No. 05-2682UnpublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ALARCÓN, Circuit Judge.

Kyle A. Williams appeals from the District Court’s order dismissing his pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for failure to exhaust his state remedies. Mr. Williams’s habeas petition asserted that the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (the “Parole Board”) violated his constitutional rights by failing adequately to notify him that it was revoking his parole, and failing to award him certain credits for time spent in custody. He argues in this appeal that the District Court erroneously dismissed his petition…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Bronshtein v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  3. Lambert v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  4. Koken v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Commonwealth v. OstroskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Anthony Robinson v. Superintendent Hainsworth, et al.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
  2. CROSBY v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLEDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  3. CUMMINGS v. ADAMSDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
  4. Delvon Knight v. Gina Clark, et al.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
  5. EDMONDSON v. THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLEDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API