Rushton v. Lelander
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angelés County. N. P. Conrey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P. J.
Appeal from a judgment discharging an alternative writ of mandamus, and for costs expended.
The petition, the basis for the issuance of the alternative writ, discloses that' the freeholders’ charter of Los Angeles city contains certain provisions with reference to the initiative and referendum; the first thereof having reference to the initiative is found in section 198a, which provides: “The signatures to the petition need not all be appended to one paper, but each signer shall add to his signature his place of residence, giving the street and number. One of the signers of each such paper…
2Cited by7 opinions
- State Bank v. SchultzeMontana Supreme Court · 1922
- Dalton v. LelandeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Kerley v. WetherellIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
- Aad Temple Building Ass'n v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Ferle v. ParsonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.