Legal Opinion

State Bank v. Schultze

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1922No. 4,780PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Galen

A rehearing was granted in this case, and in consequence a different view is entertained regarding the questions presented, though the result is the same in effect as to the appellant, Minnie Schultze. So as to avoid confusion and encumbrance of the record, the original opinion rendered herein May 18, 1922, is withdrawn and this one substituted.

It appears that the plaintiff, The State Bank of New Salem, a North Dakota corporation, brought suit against Max, Minnie and Fred C. R. Schultze, and one Oscar Goeschel, seeking recovery upon several promissory notes described, aggregating $11,940.67,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Power & Bro., Ltd. v. TurnerMontana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Featherman v. Granite CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Ogle v. PotterMontana Supreme Court · 1900
  4. State ex rel. McHatton v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Vreeland v. EdensMontana Supreme Court · 1907

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Reid v. District Court of Second Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1952
  2. State Ex Rel. Kruletz v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Kline v. MurrayMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Montana Power Co. v. Montana Department of Public Service RegulationMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State Ex Rel. Meyer v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1936

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API