Legal Opinion

Tucker v. County of Newaygo

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 1991No. Docket 119190PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShepherd, J.

Plaintiffs appeal as of right the trial court’s opinion and order granting summary disposition to defendant on the ground that plaintiff Marilyn Tucker’s action, and, thus, plaintiff Michael Tucker’s claim of loss of consortium, were barred by the exclusive remedy provision of the Workers’ Disability Compensation Act, MCL 418.131; MSA 17.237(131), because defendant was Marilyn Tucker’s employer. Defendant cross appeals, claiming that even if the trial court erred in granting summary disposition on this ground, summary disposition could have been properly granted on several other grounds and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wells v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Flick v. CrouchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  3. Nichol v. BillotMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Farrell v. Dearborn Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Askew v. MacOmberMichigan Supreme Court · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Clark v. United Technologies Automotive, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Amerisure Insurance Companies v. Time Auto Transportation, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Hoste v. Shanty Creek Management, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Howard v. Dundee Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Clark v. United Technologies Automotive, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API