Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Bradford

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 28, 1949No. Crim. 4378PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.

In an information filed by the District Attorney of Los Angeles County defendant was accused in count one of a violation of subdivision 1 of section 337a of the Penal Code in that he did wilfully and unlawfully engage in pool-selling and bookmaking upon the result and purported result of horse racing. Count two charged a violation of subdivision 2 of the same code section which denounces as a crime the occupancy of any room ... or other enclosure of any kind, with books, papers or paraphernalia for the purpose of recording or registering bets.

Following the entry of not guilty pleas to each…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. McMonigleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. People v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. People v. . CorbalisNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  5. People v. HudsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. PearsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. People v. CopplaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. People v. CudaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. People v. RaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. People v. CahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API