Legal Opinion

Arambula v. Sullivan

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1891No. 6738PublishedCited by 52 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MARR, Judge.

The appellant brought this suit in the court below against the appellee in the usual form of trespass to try title and for damages to recover “lot No. 3 in block No. 2 in Millspaugh’s addition to the town of San Angelo, in Tom Green County.” It appears that said Millspaugli, who is admitted to be the common sour«e of title, laid off said addition and prepared a plat thereof, which he filed in the county clerk’s office for record, the original of which was so filed before he conveyed either the lot claimed by the plaintiff or the two lots claimed and held by the defendant. The lots…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harkey v. CainTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Wade v. DerayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Truett v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Haley v. AmestoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Sikes v. ShowsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Rio Bravo Oil Co. v. WeedTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Cartwright v. TruebloodTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Strong v. GarrettTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Easterling v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API