Legal Opinion
Neff v. Hillcrest Drive-In
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided November 23, 1976No. Docket 27464PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtL. W. Corkin, J.
The defendants appeal from a ruling of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board reversing certain rulings by the administrative law judge and ordering an unspecified increase in the compensation payments approved by the judge. This appeal requires us to interpret MCLA 418.371; MSA 17.237(371) [text set forth infra] especially subsection 3 of the statute. That section sets forth special rules for computing compensation awards for workers who were injured on a less than full-time job. This is an appeal by leave granted pursuant to GCR 1963, 806.2(1); MCLA 418.861; MSA 17.237(861).
In September of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Lahti v. FosterlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Solakis v. RobertsMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Tata v. MuskovitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Powell v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Morin v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Walker v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
- Walker v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Supreme Court · 1987