Hagenah v. Bidwell
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Daniel C. Deasy, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.
The defendants appeal from a judgment for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff while riding on a motorcycle which, while being driven by one Reed, came into collision with an automobile driven by the defendant, Maude A. Bidwell.
The plaintiff alleged that at the time of the accident he was riding along a" public highway “in a westerly direction and was on the extreme northerly side of said road within a foot from the northerly edge of said highway; that while riding as aforesaid plaintiff was on his right-hand side of the road” and that “the defendants were riding in their aforesaid…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Harrington v. Los Angeles Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Hartley v. LasaterWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- County of Alameda v. TieslauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Cary v. Los Angeles Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Skene v. GrahamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Zinn ex rel. Zinn v. UpdegraffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Mathers v. County of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Callahan v. HarmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Finney v. WiermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.