Kurtenbach v. Frito-Lay
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, Chief Justice
(on reassignment).
[¶ 1.] Employer appeals Department of Labor’s award of rehabilitation benefits to Claimant for a five and one-half year collegiate metallurgical engineering program. By notice of review, Claimant appeals the circuit court’s denial of benefits during the time prior to petitioning the Department of Labor for rehabilitation benefits as well as the denial of Cozine benefits. We reverse in part and remand in part.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] Roger Kurtenbach was employed as a route salesperson with Frito-Lay (Employer) for approximately thirteen years when he suffered a work-related back injury…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Nilson v. Clay CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Petersen v. Hinky DinkySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Cozine v. Midwest Coast Transport, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Hendrix v. Graham Tire Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Belhassen v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re the Revocation of the Suspended Sentence of BrownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Sutherland v. Queen of Peace HospitalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Belhassen v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re the Revocation of the Suspended Sentence of BrownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.