Legal Opinion

Belhassen v. John Morrell & Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 2000No. NonePublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMUNDSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Mohammed Belhassen (Belhassen) appeals the Department of Labor’s (Department) denial of odd-lot benefits and Cozine benefits. We affirm.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] Belhassen began working for John Morrell & Company of Sioux Falls, South Dakota in April 1992.1 In October 1993, Belhassen suffered a work-related injury to his back in the course of his employment with John Morrell. As a result of this injury, Belhassen was ordered off work from October 7, 1993 to March 6, 1995.2 On May 26, 1994, Dr. Asfora performed arthroscopic surgery on Belhas-sen’s back.3 Despite the surgery,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Sopko v. C & R Transfer Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Bridge v. Karl's, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Hanson v. Penrod Construction Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Petersen v. Hinky DinkySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Wagaman v. Sioux Falls ConstructionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. BostonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Coon v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Zarecky v. ThompsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Davidson v. Horton Industries, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Lagge v. Corsica Co-OpSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API