Legal Opinion

Davinroy v. Thompson

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 24, 1959No. Civ. 17993PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, P. J.

In this action for recovery of a real estate broker’s commission earned in negotiating an exchange of real estate, defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff broker. The trial court found that the defendants entered into a written agreement of exchange with Charles W. Beeler about September 1, 1954; that this agreement was not rescinded; that pursuant to this agreement, the exchanges were completed and consummated through the City Title Insurance Company, acting as escrow; that plaintiff performed services for the defendants as a real estate broker at their written request…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Laack v. DimmickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Lathrop v. GaugerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Herring v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Stegeman v. VandeventerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Bruner v. Van's MarketsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Peacock Realty Co. v. E. Thomas Crandall Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
  2. Carey v. CusackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. LongCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  4. Broomhall v. Edgemont Mining Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  5. Davinroy v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API