Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Long

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 19, 1972No. 1 CA-CIV 1562, 1 CA-CIV 1661PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBSON, Judge.

The threshold issue raised by this appeal is whether a wife who has been given the actual authority to renew an automobile insurance policy, naming both spouses as insureds, and insuring a specific automobile has the general authority to cancel the policy on the named automobile and substitute another automobile therefor without the knowledge or consent of her husband.

This present action arose out of a personal injury lawsuit brought by plaintiffsappellees (the Longs) against Mr. and Mrs. Lindsay Mitchell. That personal injury suit had its factual foundation in an automobile…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lovetro v. SteersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. De Santis v. DixonArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Jones v. Dubuque Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Kent v. DAIRYLAND MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANYNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  5. City of Phoenix v. DicksonArizona Supreme Court · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ruesga v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. Mid-Century Insurance v. DuzykowskiArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Torrez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  4. Ferree v. City of YumaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  5. Matland v. United Automobile Ass'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API