Hillebrands v. Nibbelink
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ottawa. Assumpsit.- Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.
Henry Nibbelink, the defendant in error, presented certain claims against the estate of his father, Seth Nibbelink, which were rejected by the commissioners, but allowed on appeal to the circuit court for Ottawa county, from which error is brought into this eourt. These claims consisted chiefly of earnings paid by Henry into the family stock, and services rendered to his father, and various outlays. The earliest items were for his wages in an establishment known as the Plugger Mills, in 1865, 1866, 1867 and 1868, alleged to have amounted to over $1,500. The claim filed averred this to have…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Carter v. CarterMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Colgrove v. SolomonMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by14 opinions
- In re Williams' EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Carr v. LeavittMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Patrick v. HowardMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Thorbahn v. Walker's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Luizzi v. Brady's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.