Legal Opinion

Lewiston Urban Renewal Authority v. City of Lewiston

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 9, 1976PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

POMEROY, Justice.

A decision of the cause now before us requires a brief analysis of 23 M.R.S.A. 3004 1 and the effect, if any, of 30 M.R.S. A. 4815(3) 2 and 30 M.R.S.A. 4815(9) 3 on the process for vacation and discontinuance of public ways.

The question to be answered may be described as follows: May the City of Lew-iston, by contract with the Urban Renewal Authority, legally bind itself to the discontinuance of a town way in the future ?

We face this question because the City of Lewiston has appealed from the granting of a motion for summary judgment and mandatory injunction entered against…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Central Maine Power Co. v. Waterville Urban Renewal AuthoritySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
  2. Larson v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1945
  3. Pippenger v. City of MishawakaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Connors v. International Harvester Credit Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API