Legal Opinion
Pippenger v. City of Mishawaka
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 25, 1949No. 17,881PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrumpacker, J.
The trial court sustained a demurrer to the appellants’ complaint and upon their refusal to plead over entered judgment against them. Alleged error in such ruling presents the only question involved in this appeal.
The complaint alleges in substance that the appellants are residents and taxpayers of the city of Mishawaka, Indiana, and as such have the right to and do use the public streets of said city. That on the 4th day of December, 1944, said city, acting through its Board of Public Works, hereinafter called the board, entered into a written contract with the appellee, New York Central…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Zoercher v. AglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1930
- Budd v. Bd. of Co. Comrs. of St. Joseph Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1939
- Windle v. City of ValparaisoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
- Holliday v. PerryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
- City of Indianapolis v. MaagIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Maryland Classified Employees Ass'n v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Allen County Council v. StellhornIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Jayhawk Racing Props., LLC v. City of TopekaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2018
- Meinschein v. J. R. Short Milling Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1973
- Lewiston Urban Renewal Authority v. City of LewistonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.