Legal Opinion
Marriage of Baker v. Baker
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 26, 2008No. A06-1252PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYER, Justice.
In this dissolution action, we review two issues. First, we are asked to decide whether the investment return 1 on the nonmarital portion of certain retirement accounts is also nonmarital. The court of appeals held that the investment return 2 on the nonmarital portion of the retirement accounts is marital property, attributing to the account holder, under an agency theory, the actions of an investment advisor. Baker v. Baker, 733 N.W.2d 815, 821-22 (Minn.App.2007). In addition, the court of appeals determined that the account holder’s own actions with respect to the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Marriage of Nardini v. NardiniSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Marriage of Schmitz v. SchmitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Faus v. FausSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Marriage of Antone v. AntoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Warner v. WarnerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Daniel Garcia-Mendoza v. 2003 Chevy Tahoe, Vin 1GNEC13V23R143453, Plate 235JBMSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Coufal v. CoufalNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. HormannCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- Gill v. GillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- U.S. Bank N.A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.