U.S. Bank N.A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WORKE, Judge.
Following a reverse stock split and redemption of appellants’ resulting fractional shares of respondent-corporation, appellants asserted this action in district court, seeking judicial valuation of their interest. The district court determined that appellants had no right to a judicial valuation under the Minnesota Business Corporations Act and, accordingly, entered judgment in favor of respondents. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellants are several trusts — which owned shares of respondent Cold Spring Granite Company (CSG) — and their trustees. Respondents are CSG; its majority…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gruenhagen v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Alpha Real Estate Co. of Rochester v. Delta Dental Plan of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Brua v. MINNESOTA JOINT UNDERWRITING ASS'NSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Martinco v. HastingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Genin v. 1996 Mercury Marquis, VIN No. 2MEBP95F9CX644211, License No. MN 225 NSGSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- U.S. Bank N. A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- In re the Welfare of the Child of E.A.C.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- Lakes Area Business Ass'n v. City of Forest LakeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- U.S. Bank N.A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010