Legal Opinion

U.S. Bank N.A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 14, 2010No. A10-252PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WORKE, Judge.

Following a reverse stock split and redemption of appellants’ resulting fractional shares of respondent-corporation, appellants asserted this action in district court, seeking judicial valuation of their interest. The district court determined that appellants had no right to a judicial valuation under the Minnesota Business Corporations Act and, accordingly, entered judgment in favor of respondents. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellants are several trusts — which owned shares of respondent Cold Spring Granite Company (CSG) — and their trustees. Respondents are CSG; its majority…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gruenhagen v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Alpha Real Estate Co. of Rochester v. Delta Dental Plan of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  3. Brua v. MINNESOTA JOINT UNDERWRITING ASS'NSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. Martinco v. HastingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  5. Genin v. 1996 Mercury Marquis, VIN No. 2MEBP95F9CX644211, License No. MN 225 NSGSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. U.S. Bank N. A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  2. In re the Welfare of the Child of E.A.C.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  3. Lakes Area Business Ass'n v. City of Forest LakeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  4. U.S. Bank N.A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API