Legal Opinion
State v. Hormann
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 19, 2011No. A10-1872PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINGE, Judge.
Appellant Danny Lee Hormann challenges his convictions of stalking his then-wife and installing a mobile tracking device on her car, arguing (1) the district court abused its discretion by admitting testimonial evidence of his misconduct during the marriage; (2) the district court erred by denying his motion for acquittal and submitting the tracking-device charge to the jury; and (3) the stalking statute is unconstitutionally vague. We affirm the eviden-tiary ruling and the conviction of stalking, reverse the tracking-device conviction, and do not reach the constitutional…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. PostSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. BoyceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Werner, Dieter HeinzCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- State v. McCormickCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Ness v. City of BloomingtonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
- State of Minnesota v. Abe Joseph BousheeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Steve VangCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.