Sanchez v. Old Pueblo Anesthesia, P.C.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ECKERSTROM, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 Appellants Lorenzo and Bertha Sanchez appeal from the tidal court’s dismissal of their complaint against Daniel Hughes, M.D., and Old Pueblo Anesthesia, P.C., for the Sanchezes’ failure to obtain a preliminary expert opinion affidavit from an anesthesiologist to support their claim. They argue that, because their claim is based on res ipsa loquitur, the relevant statutes, A.R.S. §§ 12-2603 and 12-2604, do not require them to engage an expert in the specialty of each physician they allege may have been negligent. The Sanchezes also argue the trial court…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Boyce v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1938
- Aranda v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2000
- Riedisser v. NelsonArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- Maycock v. Asilomar Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Austin v. City of ScottsdaleArizona Supreme Court · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Seisinger v. SiebelArizona Supreme Court · 2009
- Harvey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Simon v. MARICOPA MEDICAL CENTERCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Felipe v. Theme Tech Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Cornerstone Hospital of Southeast Arizona v. Ernest H. BlackburnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.