Legal Opinion

Sanchez v. Old Pueblo Anesthesia, P.C.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 30, 2008No. 2 CA-CV 2007-0131PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ECKERSTROM, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Appellants Lorenzo and Bertha Sanchez appeal from the tidal court’s dismissal of their complaint against Daniel Hughes, M.D., and Old Pueblo Anesthesia, P.C., for the Sanchezes’ failure to obtain a preliminary expert opinion affidavit from an anesthesiologist to support their claim. They argue that, because their claim is based on res ipsa loquitur, the relevant statutes, A.R.S. §§ 12-2603 and 12-2604, do not require them to engage an expert in the specialty of each physician they allege may have been negligent. The Sanchezes also argue the trial court…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Boyce v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Aranda v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Riedisser v. NelsonArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Maycock v. Asilomar Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  5. Austin v. City of ScottsdaleArizona Supreme Court · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Seisinger v. SiebelArizona Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Harvey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  3. Simon v. MARICOPA MEDICAL CENTERCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  4. Felipe v. Theme Tech Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  5. Cornerstone Hospital of Southeast Arizona v. Ernest H. BlackburnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API