Legal Opinion

Boyce v. Brown

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1938No. Civil No. 3927PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

Berlie B. Boyce and Nannie E. Boyce, his wife, hereinafter called plaintiffs, brought suit against Edgar H. Brown, hereinafter called defendant, to recover damages for alleged malpractice by the defendant upon the person of Nannie E. Boyce. The case was tried to a jury and, at the close of the evidence for plaintiffs, the court granted a motion for an instructed verdict in favor of the defendant, on the ground that there was no competent testimony that he was guilty of any acts of commission or omission sufficient, as a matter of law, to charge him with malpractice. Judgment was rendered on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Butler v. RuleArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Rising v. VeatchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. County of Pinal v. HeinerArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Butler v. RuleArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Connelly v. ConeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Smith v. YoheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Gaston v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  3. Seisinger v. SiebelArizona Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Getchell v. MansfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Rossell v. Volkswagen of AmericaArizona Supreme Court · 1985

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API