Legal Opinion

Aiton v. Board of Medical Examiners

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1910No. Civil No. 1109PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial District of the Territory of Arizona, in and for the County of Maricopa. Edward Kent, Judge.

1Per curiam

The record in this case disclosed that the appellant filed in the court below a notice of motion for a writ of certiorari, accompanied by the affidavit of the petitioner, setting forth the facts upon which the application was based. No motion appears of record. The affidavit concludes with a prayer that a writ of certiorari be allowed. The defendant, evidently in doubt as to the view the trial court might take as to whether the application was by motion or petition, answered ‘ Un resistance of said motion and the allowance of the writ,” showing “that the facts stated in the petition of said…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Meloy v. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Gonzales v. Duey & OverlockArizona Supreme Court · 1914
  3. City of Phoenix v. JonesArizona Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API