Legal Opinion

Puckett v. C. K. Minter Drilling Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 22, 1966No. 44,338PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fontron, J.:

This is a workmen’s compensation case. The claimant, Forrest Puckett, was employed as an oil field driller by the respondent, C. K. Minter Drilling Company. While so employed, he was struck on the side of the head by a heavy bushing, as a result of which he received a concussion, skull fracture and serious injury to his back.

At a hearing before the workmen’s compensation examiner, where it was stipulated that claimant sustained personal injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment, the claimant was found to have…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gorrell v. BattelleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  2. Gailey v. Peet Bros. Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. McGhee v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Beal v. El Dorado Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  5. Rupp v. JacobsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Inland Container Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  2. Anderson v. Kinsley Sand & Gravel, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  3. Hardman v. City of IolaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  4. Gray v. A. L. Beller & Home Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  5. Davis v. Winchester Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API