Legal Opinion
Paperchase Partnership v. Bruckner
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided January 15, 1985No. 15256PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALTERS, Justice.
The trial court granted a summary judgment to defendants on plaintiff Paperchase Partnership’s (Paperchase) suit for the balance due on a land sale contract or, alternatively, for return of the subject real property. Paperchase appeals and we affirm.
Paperchase in 1977 sold an apartment complex to Donald, Elizabeth and Ronald Bruckner (Bruckners) by a real estate contract containing a clause prohibiting assignment without consent. The contract provided for monthly payments on the purchase price by Bruckners and, in the event of non-payment, for forfeiture of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Westgate Families v. County Clerk of the Inc. County of Los AlamosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
- Jelso v. World Balloon Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
- Young v. ThomasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- Cheney v. BilbyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- Bishop v. BarndtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- C.R. Anthony Co. v. Loretto Mall PartnersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- Valdez v. Cillessen & Son, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
- Vermejo Park Corp. v. Kaiser Coal Corp. (In re Kaiser Steel Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Heiner v. S.J. Groves & Sons Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1990
- Yu v. Paperchase PartnershipNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.