Legal Opinion

Morris v. Eastern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 19, 1902No. Nos. 13,207-(164)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Harrison, J., overruling a demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

This appeal is from an order overruling a general demurrer to a complaint in a personal injury action brought by a guardian ad litem. It was alleged in this pleading that the defendant carelessly and negligently provided for the use of a minor in its employment, named Morris, aged seventeen years, whom we shall hereafter call the “plaintiff,” and his brother, a co-employee, a “flogging hammer,” so called, to be used by them in connection with what is known as a “side-set” (a cold-chisel with a handle attached), in cutting off rivets from the tank frame of a locomotive tender in the shop in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hefferen v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Koschman v. AshSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Williams v. Garbutt Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  3. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. MayneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Vant Hul v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  5. Cayse v. Foley Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API