Legal Opinion

Harris v. Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1934No. 25113. Department TwoPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This action was brought by appellant to recover against respondent upon two causes of action stated in the complaint. In his first cause of action, appellant seeks to require respondent to repurchase five shares of seven per cent cumulative, partici pating, preferred stock of Georgia Hotel Company, Ltd., issued to Mm. In the second cause of action, he sues to require respondent to repurchase ten shares of the same class of stock issued to a Mrs. Eogers, at the request of her husband, J. W. Eogers, who bought and paid for the stock. Both Eogers and his wife assigned their rights of action, if…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Spokane County v. PrescottWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Bennett v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Johnston v. KeeferIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Winchester & Lexington Turnpike Co. v. Wickliffe's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
  5. Olsen v. Northern Steamship Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Magee v. Mercantile-Commerce Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API