Legal Opinion

State v. Christenson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 8, 2002No. C973106CR; A103630PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

The state indicted defendant on charges of manufacture, delivery, and possession of marijuana. ORS 475.999; ORS 475.992. Defendant moved to suppress all evidence obtained as a result of a warrantless search of his residence. The trial court granted the motion, and the state appeals. We affirm.

The facts are largely undisputed. On August 13, 1997, at approximately 9:20 a.m., defendant’s neighbor made a call to 9-1-1, reporting that defendant’s front door was open and that his two pit bull dogs were at large. The neighbor said that she had gone to the open front door and called in, with no…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. BridewellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. FollettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. DahlOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. ApodacaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  5. State v. BramsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. MacDonald v. Town of EasthamCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  2. State v. DeneuiSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. State of Arizona v. Bradley Harold WilsonArizona Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. BurdickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API