Legal Opinion
State v. Apodaca
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided April 22, 1987No. 82-3621-C-3; CA A39294PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized by the police during a warrantless search of the house in which he was arrested. The dispositive issue is whether the police lawfully entered the house. We conclude that they did not. Therefore, we reverse.
About 2:30 a.m., Trooper McNielly investigated a one car accident on Lampman Road near Gold Hill. The car had rolled over and was seriously damaged. No one was in or around it. It was registered to defendant at an…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Vale v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. BridewellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. ChristensonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. BramsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- State v. StoudamireCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.