Legal Opinion
Colaprico v. Sun Microsystems, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 13, 1991No. Civ. 90-20610-SWPublishedCited by 123 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ STATE LAW CLAIM FOR NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE PARAGRAPHS 29 AND 38 OF PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
SPENCER WILLIAMS, District Judge.
Defendants move to dismiss count III and to strike paragraphs 29 and 38 of the first amended complaint. Because count III of the complaint states a valid claim for negligent misrepresentation under California law, defendants’ motion to dismiss this claim is DENIED. Because paragraphs 29 and 38 of the complaint are not clearly irrelevant to a determination of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Durning v. First Boston Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Alfus v. Pyramid Technology Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by123 opinions
- Neilson v. Union Bank of California, N.A.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
- Platte Anchor Bolt, Inc. v. IHI, INC.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
- California Department of Toxic Substances Control v. Alco Pacific, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2002
- LeDuc v. Kentucky Central Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1992
- Bureerong v. UvawasDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1996
118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.