Legal Opinion

People v. Howard

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 28, 1922No. Crim. No. 620PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The defendants were by information jointly charged and thereunder tried for the crime of grand larceny, and were convicted of the crime so charged. They and each of them appeal from the judgment of conviction and the order denying their motion for a new trial.

The defendants appeared for trial without an attorney, having previously, and at the time of their arraignment upon the charge alleged against them in the information, refused to accept the offer of the court to appoint an attorney or attorneys to conduct their defense, preferring themselves to manage the trial of their case, which they…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. People v. FlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. People v. BoxerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. People v. NicholsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  5. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rideout v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. People v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. People v. SorrentinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. People v. LancellottiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Porris v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API